Today’s Diane Rhem show on WAMU had a discussion of what it called the Conservative Christian movement, but in more precise terms — and one I wasn’t familiar with — is Dominonism.
Guests included Chris Hedges, a former NY Times reporter (whose name rang a bell for me as he was a reporter for the Dallas Morning News during my time in that prairie town), Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Bob Edgar, general secretary of National Council of Churches and the ubiquitous E.J. Dionne.
Hedges said the National Religious Broadcasters Association runs “a parallel information network” that seeks to make this a Christian nation. Leaders of this movement include the well known James Dobson who called Roe v. Wade the “biggest Holocaust in history.” The NRBA has pushed out even evangelicals. Dionne made the point that these leaders aren’t just “people of religion” or evangelicals but radicals intent on forcing their view on the rest of us.
Perkins used many of the phrases we’ve come to know well. He talked about how Christians are “under assault” and how there is “hostility toward Christians.” He accused the judiciary of imposing a “public policy that is hostile to Christian heritage of this country.” He specifically mentioned sex ed and homosexuality as battlegrounds for today’s Christians.
Hedges has an article in this month’s Harpers (begins on page 10 of the linked pdf file) that chroncilces his attendance at the NRBA convention.
[Illinois evangelist and radio host James MacDonald] reminds us, quoting theologian Peter Berger, that “ages of faith are not marked by dialogue but by proclarnation” and that “there is power in the unapologetic proclamation of truth. There is power in it. This is a kingdom of power.” When he says the word “power,” he draws it out for emphasis. He tells the crowd to shun the “persuasive words of human wisdom.”
Truth, he says, does “not rest in the wisdom of men but the power of God.” Then, in a lisping, limp-wristed imitation of liberals, he mocks, to laughter and applause, those who want to “share” and be sensitive to the needs of others.
…[Frank Wright, the new president of NRB, says] “Today, the calls for diversity and multiculturalism
are nothing more than thinly veiled attacks on anyone willing, desirous, or compelled to proclaim Christian truths,” he says. “Today, calls for tolerance are often a subterfuge, because they will tolerate just about anything except Christian truth. Today, we live in a time when the message entrusted to you is more important than ever before to reach a world desperate to know Christ.”
Hedges describes the Dominionism movement.
What the disparate sects of this movement, known as Dominionism, share is an obsession with political power. A decades-long refusal to engage in politics at all following the Scopes trial has been replaced by a call for Christian “dominion” over the nation and, eventually, over the earth itself. Dominionists preach that Jesus has called them to build the kingdom of God in the here and now, whereas previously it was thought that we would have to wait for it. America becomes, in this militant biblicism, an agent of God, and all political and intellectual opponents of America’s Christian leaders are viewed, quite simply, as agents of Satan. Under Christian dominion, America will no longer be a sinful and fallen nation but one in which the Ten Commandments form the basis of our legal system, Creationism and “Christian values” form the basis of our educational system, and the media and the government proclaim the Good News to one and all.
Aside from its proselytizing mandate, the federal government will be reduced to the protection of property rights and “homeland” security.’ Some Dominionists (not all of whom accept the label, at least not publicly) would further require all citizens to pay “tithes” to church organizations empowered by the government to run our social welfare agencies, and a number of influential figures advocate the death penalty for a host of “moral crimes,” including apostasy, blasphemy, sodomy, and witchcraft. The only legitimate voices in this state will be Christian. All others will be silenced.
The traditional evangelicals, those who come out of Billy Graham’s mold, are not necessarily comfortable with the direction taken by the Dominionists, who now control most of America’s major evangelical organizations, from the NRB to the Southern Baptist Convention, and may already claim dominion over the Christian media outlets. But Christians who challenge Dominionists, even if they are fundamentalist or conservative or born-again, tend to be ruthlessly thrust aside.
…Luis Palau, a well-known evangelical preacher who is close to Billy Graham. “I don’t think it is wrong to want to see political change, especially in places like Latin America,” he says. “Something has to happen
in politics. But it has to be based on convictions. We have to overcome the sense of despair.
I worked in Latin America in the days when almost every country had a dictator. I dreamed, especially as a kid, of change, of freedom and justice. But I believe that change comes from personal conviction, from leading a more biblical lifestyle, not by Christianizing a nation. If we become called to Christ, we will
build an effective nation through personal ethics. When you lead a life of purity, when you respect your wife and are good to your family, when you don’t waste money gambling and womanizing, you begin to work for better schools, for more protection and safety from your community. All change, historically,
comes from the bottom up.”
Hedges, who studied to be a minister like his dad, concludes,
I can’t help but recall the words of my ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, Dr. James Luther Adams, who told us that when we were his age, and he was then close to eighty, we would all be fighting the “Christian fascists.”
He gave us that warning twenty-five years ago, when Pat Robertson and other prominent evangelists began speaking of a new political religion that would direct its efforts at taking control of all major American institutions, including mainstream denominations and the government, so as to transform the United States into a global Christian empire. At the time, it was hard to take such fantastic rhetoric
seriously. But fascism, Adams warned, would not return wearing swastikas and brown shirts.
Its ideological inheritors would cloak themselves in the language of the Bible; they would come carrying crosses and chanting the Pledge of Allegiance.
Adams had watched American intellectuals and industrialists flirt with fascism in the 1930s. Mussolini’s “Corporatism,” which created an unchecked industrial and business aristocracy, had appealed to many at the time as an effective counterweight to the New Deal. In 1934, Fortune magazine lavished praise on the Italian dictator for his defanging of labor unions and his empowerment of industrialists
at the expense of workers. Then as now, Adams said, too many liberals failed to understand the power and allure of evil, and when the radical Christians came, these people would undoubtedly play by the old, polite rules of democracy long after those in power had begun to dismantle the democratic state. Adams had watched German academics fall silent or conform. -He knew how desperately people want to believe the comfortable lies told by totalitarian movements, how easily those lies lull moderates into passivity.
Adam told us to watch closely the Christian right’s persecution of homosexuals and lesbians. Hitler, he reminded us, promised to restore moral values not long after he took power in 1933, then imposed a ban on all homosexual and lesbian organizations and publications. Then came raids on the places where homosexuals gathered, culminating on May 6, 1933, with the ransacking of the Institute for Sexual
Science in Berlin. Twelve thousand volumes from the institute’s library were tossed into a public bonfire. Homosexuals and lesbians, Adams said, would be the first “deviants” singled out by the Christian right.
We would be the next.
Here’s another interview with Hedges.
It’s wise for us — and certainly for the politicians we support — to distinguish Christians and evangelicals from their Dominionist leaders. But we need to encourage them, especially those like Tim Kaine and others whose Christian faith is important to them, to make that distinction. In fact, it’s imperative for them to explain to Christians that they are not the enemy. Perhaps we can recruit some of those in the East Waynesville Baptist Church who know that a line has been crossed.