{"id":529,"date":"2006-07-07T12:40:20","date_gmt":"2006-07-07T16:40:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/000af36.netsolhost.com\/wordpress1\/2006\/07\/07\/pack_journalism\/"},"modified":"2006-07-07T12:40:20","modified_gmt":"2006-07-07T16:40:20","slug":"pack_journalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/2006\/07\/07\/pack_journalism\/","title":{"rendered":"Pack Journalism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When I read stories like today\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20060707\/ap_on_el_ge\/divided_democrats_1 \">AP contribution to pack journalism<\/a>, I\u2019m reminded of one of Dave Poisson\u2019s best lines in his debate against Dick Black for the eastern Loudoun County\u2019s House seat in Virginia\u2019s General Assembly.  Black repeatedly attacked Poisson for not being in lock step with his party\u2019s gubernatorial candidate Tim Kaine on some issues.  Black, meanwhile, touted his devotion to every one of Jerry Kilgore\u2019s positions.  Poisson rose to respond and said, \u201cOne thing great about being a Democrat is that we get to think for ourselves.\u201d  The crowd roared its approval.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats in Congress almost unanimously agree on many things:  that the war was a mistake (Sen. Joe Lieberman the only noteworthy exception); that Social Security should not be privatized; that deficits need to be addressed; that tax cuts have helped overwhelmingly the well-to-do; that the economic playing filed is anything but level; and on and on.  But because they don\u2019t have a single answer as to the timeline for getting out of Iraq &#8212; while the GOP has no timeline at all and simply wants to stay the disastrous course &#8212; Democrats are headed for defeat in November.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[P]rimary clashes are drawing unwanted attention to Democratic divisions on the war while raising questions about whether the Democrats&#8217; competing factions are, in effect, torpedoing the party&#8217;s chances to make 2006 a referendum on Bush&#8217;s handling of Iraq.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If I\u2019m a voter unhappy with the war &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pollingreport.com\/iraq.htm  \">as an overwhelming majority of Americans are <\/a>&#8212; and hold George Bush responsible for the debacle &#8212; as they do &#8212; they why would the Democrats, who are not in power and but for a very few, feel we should set some type of timetable for getting out, be the party at risk in November?<\/p>\n<p>Because the press, regurgitating the Bush spin, says so.  <\/p>\n<p>Of course, the GOP has no view on when the war should end, except when the mission is accomplished, when they Iraqis step up.  Completely lacking in the press are any voices asking very simple questions of the president:  How will we know that the Iraqis have \u201cstepped up\u201d?  What constitutes a \u201cstable Iraq\u201d? How will we know when we\u2019ve won the war on terror?  What will victory look like?  Will one terrorist attack in the world every month mean the war is still on?  How about one per year?  <\/p>\n<p>And again, courtesy of the AP, we get from the press the idea that it is <strong>liberals<\/strong> and <strong>leftists<\/strong> who want out of Iraq.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Senate primary fights in Connecticut and Washington state as well as a few House contests pit the party&#8217;s <strong>liberal<\/strong> wing \u2014 proponents of candidates who want an immediate end to the conflict \u2014 against <strong>moderates <\/strong>favored by Democratic leaders in Washington.<\/p>\n<p>Arguably the most high-profile and contentious case is Connecticut, where three-term Sen. Joe Lieberman is under siege for his staunch support of the war and Bush&#8217;s national security policies. <strong>Liberal <\/strong>bloggers and <strong>left-leaning <\/strong>groups are pushing the candidacy of multimillionaire businessman Ned Lamont, who wants U.S. troops to start coming home now.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026 Jerry McNerney said it was time to withdraw U.S. troops, and his campaign had the support of proponents of former anti-war presidential candidate Howard Dean. <strong>Moderate <\/strong>Democrat Steve Filson opposed an immediate withdrawal and was preferred by House Democratic leaders. McNerney won the June primary and will try to unseat seven-term Republican Rep. Richard Pombo (news, bio, voting record).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Liberals<\/strong> also have targeted first-term Sen. Maria Cantwell (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash., who supported the war but has criticized Bush&#8217;s stewardship. She faces challenges from anti-war activists who want U.S. troops out, including one candidate who has the support of peace activist Cindy Sheehan. The challengers lack the cash and name recognition, but their candidacies have caused the state&#8217;s <strong>political left <\/strong>to turn on Cantwell because of the war. The primary is Sept. 19.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026 Eli Pariser, director of MoveOn, a <strong>liberal <\/strong>group backing Lamont, said: &#8220;We&#8217;re trying to play a constructive role in helping amplify the boldest voices and quiet the ones which are undermining the way that the Democrats are different from the Republicans.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>The November elections will be the arbiter on the effectiveness of <strong>liberal <\/strong>groups. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Can they swing general elections is the big question, and so far we don&#8217;t know the answer. But they certainly can have an impact on primaries,&#8221; said Matt Bennett, co-founder of Third Way, a group of <strong>moderate<\/strong> Democrats. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Just how many times can a reporter use the words \u201cliberal\u201d and \u201cleftist\u201d in a story to describe a viewpoint that is indeed moderate or even conservative &#8212; the notion that foreign entanglements should be taken very judiciously, while labeling such adventurism as \u201cmoderate\u201d?<\/p>\n<p>It is destructive to political discourse to choose incorrect adjectives to describe a viewpoint.  Most people consider themselves moderates, rather than radicals or reactionaries, and most Americans are opposed to this war.  Have Americans become radicalized?<\/p>\n<p>Finally, this AP story ends with a poor analogy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If 1968 is any guide, Iraq could continue to have repercussions. Nearly 40 years ago, Vietnam so divided the party that Democrats lost to Richard M. Nixon.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While the anti-war movement was only beginning to get its legs in 1968, the general public was not there yet.  Contrary to today, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seanet.com\/~jimxc\/Politics\/Mistakes\/Vietnam_support.html\">Vietnam war still had widespread support<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[I]n a poll conducted in February 1968, 25 per cent wanted to &#8220;gradually broaden and intensify our military operations&#8221;, and 28 per cent wanted to &#8220;start an all-out crash effort in the hope of winning the war quickly even at the risk of China or Russia entering the war&#8221;.  Just 24 per cent wanted to &#8220;discontinue the struggle and begin to pull out of Vietnam gradually in the near future&#8221;, and 10 per cent wanted to &#8220;continue the war at the present level of military effort&#8221;.  <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But hey, why let facts get in the way of a good story?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I read stories like today\u2019s AP contribution to pack journalism, I\u2019m reminded of one of Dave Poisson\u2019s best lines in his debate against Dick Black for the eastern Loudoun County\u2019s House seat in Virginia\u2019s General Assembly. Black repeatedly attacked Poisson for not being in lock step with his party\u2019s gubernatorial candidate Tim Kaine on&hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/2006\/07\/07\/pack_journalism\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}