{"id":396,"date":"2008-10-28T14:40:21","date_gmt":"2008-10-28T18:40:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/000af36.netsolhost.com\/wordpress1\/2008\/10\/28\/quoting-the-cuplrits\/"},"modified":"2008-10-28T14:40:21","modified_gmt":"2008-10-28T18:40:21","slug":"quoting-the-cuplrits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/2008\/10\/28\/quoting-the-cuplrits\/","title":{"rendered":"Quoting the Cuplrits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last Thursday, The Washington Post ran a story about the Congressional hearing of the credit-rating agencies.&nbsp; In the coverage of that hearing, two quotes were often cited.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/servlet\/story\/LAC.20081023.RBANKSRATINGS23\/TPStory\/Business\">One was an instant messaging<\/a> conversation:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In April, 2007, Shannon Mooney, a senior analyst at rating agency <b>Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s<\/b> in New York, started gossiping with a colleague via instant messaging when the conversation turned to a rating the firm was about to issue.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That deal is ridiculous,&#8221; the colleague, Rahul Shah, wrote.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I know right &#8230; model def. does not capture half of the [risk],&#8221; Ms. Mooney replied.  <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We should not be rating it,&#8221; Mr. Shah said.  <\/p>\n<h6>&#8220;We rate every deal,&#8221; Ms. Mooney wrote. &#8220;It could be structured by cows and we would rate it.&#8221;<\/h6>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The Globe and Mail was the only publication I found that named the parties to this conversation.<\/p>\n<p>The other exchange <a href=\" http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/10\/22\/AR2008102202311.html?sub=AR\">was also revealing<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Other credit-raters took a more whimsical tone in describing the risks of mortgage-backed securities. &#8220;Let&#8217;s hope we are all wealthy and retired by the time this house of cards falters,&#8221; a high-ranking official at Standard and Poor&#8217;s wrote in December 2006. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Many publications, including The Washington Post, reported the email exchange.<\/p>\n<p>I was curious as to why these publications seem so reluctant to name the people demonstrating such irresponsibility.&nbsp; People that we taxpyers are now being asked to bailout.&nbsp; So I wrote to the Post reporter and asked who it was. In an email, Paley responded:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>I believe it was Chris Meyer. <\/p>\n<p>Do you work at one of the credit-rating agencies?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know if Paley meant that a Chris Meyer told the reporter of the quote or whether Meyer was the one who made the &#8220;house of cards&#8221; comment. <\/p>\n<p>I wrote back for clarification and not getting an answer within a day, I wrote to Post Ombudsman Deborah Howell and asked what where The Post&#8217;s guidelines were for naming people who are quoted.&nbsp; I received no answer. <\/p>\n<p>I asked for the simple reason is that I&#8217;ve noticed over the years that embarrassing quotes made by powerful people are often reported without naming the person.&nbsp; It&#8217;s as if The Post wants to protect the rich and famous from embarassment.&nbsp; Certianly, if that person is widely known, I imagine his or her friends would see them in a differnt light &#8212; as the callous and careless people they are&#8230;if not criminals.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last Thursday, The Washington Post ran a story about the Congressional hearing of the credit-rating agencies.&nbsp; In the coverage of that hearing, two quotes were often cited.&nbsp; One was an instant messaging conversation: In April, 2007, Shannon Mooney, a senior analyst at rating agency Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s in New York, started gossiping with a colleague&hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/2008\/10\/28\/quoting-the-cuplrits\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/griendling.com\/wordpress1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}